Benchmarks fail to explain why Vista falters and Server 2008 succeeds
By Jonathan Schlaffer
Microsoft would like us to believe that Windows Vista and Server 2008 are basically the same and use the same codebase but the two differ slightly in certain areas. It appears that Server 2008 performs better in almost every sense of the term but benchmarks have failed to pin down the exact reason why.
We previously reported that Server 2008 performed almost 20% faster in some cases than what is supposed be its closely related cousin, Vista.
The Register reports that part of the reason that Server 2008 doesn’t get the same negative press that Vista does is because it delivers features that people actually want.
Backoffice systems administrator Christian Mohn said,
"Windows Server 2008 performs better, even with the Aero features enabled, than Vista ever did on the same hardware. To me, this a bit strange, even if a lot of services are still disabled, as the codebase is pretty much the same as Vista."
It may not be the case that Microsoft is being exactly truthful about the "same codebase" or it could be the case that there are other things in Vista slowing down performance which have not been revealed. In any case, it’s clear that as much as the company would like us t believe it, Vista and Server 2008 are not nearly the same animal.
Related:
Entry was posted
on Saturday, April 19th, 2008 at 5:42 pm
under 
Print This Post
Read more entries by Jonathan Schlaffer.
April 19th, 2008
[…] Original post by Jonathan Schlaffer […]
April 21st, 2008
Any word on whether the protected media streams “feature” made it into Server 2008. I’m betting if it didn’t that would account for the better performance in 2008.
April 21st, 2008
I’ll bet a donut that the reason Server2008 is faster is that it doesn’t have any Digital Rights Management junk larded into it.
April 21st, 2008
MS just recompiled all code using “release” build switch. In result Server 2008 was born.
Compiling Vista they just left compiler in “debug” mode…