Microsoft to remove "reduced functionality mode" from Vista
Vista is harder to counterfeit than Windows XP and it is not sold without a license key whereas some volume copies of Windows XP were sold without a key or all had the same key with unlimited uses. Vista is also harder to trick into thinking it has been activated, though it’s not impossible.
As we reported, Vista SP1 will be blocking the most common activation tricks so if you are running a pirated copy of Vista and want SP1 you will have to go straight. But, at the same time, Microsoft will be making things a little easier on the masses.
The Vista activation system isn’t flawless and will occasionally flag a legitimate system as pirated, in the past this was annoying because if it wasn’t activated or wrongly accused it would enter into “reduced functionality mode” which would only allow access to Internet Explorer for one hour and offer users the option to purchase a new serial key for Vista.
When SP1 is installed on a system, the “kill switch” that led to reduced functionality will be removed. This is partially because Vista isn’t running rampant with piracy and partially because the activation system itself is flawed. It’s far from perfect but with this Microsoft is righting a few wrongs.
Related Posts:
December 4th, 2007
At this point you would think Microsoft would want to have as many people as possible running the OS, pirated or not.The people who are pirating are not likely to purchase, so they haven’t really lost a sale.The people who need an ass kicking are OEMs or other sharks that charge the innocent end user for bogus product.
December 17th, 2007
It’s not about microsoft loosing / gaining a sale to someone that will not purchase it…The person that STEALS it simply does not DESERVE to use the os.
Well….
I’m never going to PAY for a new car… so it’s ok if I STEAL one? STFU…
September 8th, 2008
Activation harms legitimate users more than it does hackers. I have a legitimate copy of XP and want to upgrade my computer. After learning about activation, I don’t know if I should try installing XP on a new computer or try finding a copy of windows 2000 (I certainly don’t want to get Vista if I can help it). I am seriously considering trying to find a viable alternative to MS Windows (not likely to find one, lucky for Redmond).
No one is arguing that people who steal don’t deserve to use the os (brilliant insight you got there, einstein) – but that is not why MicroCrock is doing this. It’s about money, not principles – let’s not be naive.
As far as your (lame) car analogy, at least you can buy a used car from someone legally without asking the manufacturer (Ford, Toyota, BMW, etc.) for permission. Try doing that with Microsap!!!
rp